top of page
Search

The Function of Art According to Proudhon: A Tool for Moral Improvement


Upon the posthumous publication of the writings of the philosopher Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1865, Du principe de l’Art et de sa destination sociale, a recurring question was posed:


Must artistic creation be of social utility, or is aesthetics sufficient unto itself? This question is, moreover, central to the understanding of the term "avant-garde."


"Avant-garde" is an expression born from the pen of the Count of Saint-Simon. An avant-garde artist is one who serves the political project of Saint-Simonianism. But ten years later, in his preface to Mademoiselle de Maupin, Théophile Gautier wrote exactly the opposite:


“There is nothing truly beautiful but that which can be of no use whatsoever; everything useful is ugly”

The conception of art by the anarchist-socialist Proudhon aligns with Saint-Simon's definition, which was already largely outdated in the 1850s–1860s: that which is useful for teaching the public right and wrong is beautiful. And he takes Courbet's painting as an example of useful art!



The Proudhonian Ideal: The Supremacy of the Subject over Technique



Gustave Courbet, Proudhon et ses enfants, 1865
Gustave Courbet, Proudhon et ses enfants, 1865

Proudhon defends a strictly utilitarian conception of painting and sculpture; its sole objective residing in the moral and physical improvement of the French people. His ideal in art in no way refers to academic canons of beauty, nor to choices of color, nor to the virtuosity of the line—all of which are vain and pernicious bourgeois preoccupations.


A canvas is considered only through the prism of its subject. The artist, as conceived by Proudhon, is a moralist whose form of expression matters little, provided it is understood by the public.



The Artist as Auxiliary to the Utopian City



Proudhon, who defended many of Courbet's works, was not for all that an admirer of the raw truth of daguerreotypes, for the good artist must have the capacity to capture the unobservable: caste prejudices, the aberrations of religion, and the immense diversity of human passions.


Seen from this angle, Courbet's merit would reside not in his brushstroke, but in his capacity to paint a faithful mirror of society, which would lead the public to modify its behaviour: it would evaluate itself and correct its vices; a fat and ugly nude, as in The Bathers (1853), would encourage it to work and would fuel a growing contempt toward the wives of men of independent means.


Courbet, supposed to be Proudhon's friend, is nonetheless treated almost as an imbecile in the treatise, for failing to be docile enough and for having himself attempted to write the theory of his painting... which is reserved for the philosopher of anarchism.


Inspired by a mechanism close to Aristotelian catharsis, the work of art is thus intended to substitute itself for lived experience in order to instruct humanity.



Proudhon's Aesthetic Theory Ridiculed



His contemporaries judged the treatise harshly.


Gustave Flaubert, in his correspondence with the Goncourt brothers, spoke of an absolute ineptitude. He castigated the incompetence of the Proudhonian approach, believing that this strictly social vision signaled the death of art.


As the Zolienne weapon was very often derision, Émile Zola openly mocked the elevation of Courbet to the rank of leader of a movement of moralising painters, reduced to daubing sermons on a canvas for the benefit of a hypothetical ideal city.


Proudhonian theory proposes a system where creation has no role except as an instrument of propaganda, a question widely debated in the 20th century.




This blog relies on the primary source anthology sheets provided by Art d’Histoire Académie:


Plus all those inserted as links in the blog above


You can also view our traditional, free-access videos:

The Art d’Histoire Académie platform specialises in primary sources and digitised archives covering the artistic period from 1850 to 1910.


It offers clear, structured interactive videos accompanied by a library of over a thousand anthology sheets, comprising 10,000 explained and contextualised primary sources that can be viewed in their original format.


Whether you are preparing for an exam, a lecture, a guided tour, a conference, an exhibition, or a publication, Art d’Histoire Académie is here to support you. The labyrinth of archives simply becomes what it ought to be for any passionate researcher: a source of inspiration and a space for fulfilment.

 
 
bottom of page