top of page
Search

How did painting and sculpture transition from the status of a craft to that of a noble art?



In 17th and 18th-century France, wielding a painter’s brush or a sculptor’s hammer was not always considered a high-level intellectual activity.


These practices, as manual tasks, were subject to the same commercial rules as carpentry or glazing, which were governed by guilds since the Middle Ages.


A long institutional struggle allowed painting and sculpture to extract themselves from the condition of a "mechanical art," overseen by the master jurors of the guilds, to rise to the rank of a deregulated "liberal art."




The War of the Academies and the Stakes of the Live Model



In the middle of the 17th century, French artistic education split into two opposing camps. On one hand, the Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture, founded in 1648, embodied the ambition of the artist's nobility. On the other hand, the historic painters' guild replied the year after the Royal Academy’s creation by opening its own educational establishment, which would become the Academy of Saint Luke.


The latter managed for a time to attract many students through very attractive fees and relied on the prestige of figures returning from Rome, such as Pierre Mignard and his former master, Simon Vouet.


In 1915, the historian Jules Guiffrey recalled that this rivalry crystallised around the teaching of study from the live model. Why?


He who masters the nude masters history painting—the grand genre. Others would be relegated to mere decorators.


It was not until the beginning of the 18th century that Louis XIV again authorised the guild to use the live model, but only behind closed doors.



The Ambiguity of the Academy of Saint Luke



Despite this apparent subordination, the Academy of Saint Luke enjoyed a prosperous period during the Enlightenment. Research conducted by Charlotte Guichard indicates that the corporatist institution benefited from advantageous tax exemptions and managed to organise regular exhibitions, notably those known as the "Colisée," which directly competed with those of the Salon of the Royal Academy and its academic artists.


But in 1766, it seemed that a secession threatened, as in 1648, when the royal artists had obtained their own house.


About forty members, claiming their status as men of talent, rose up against the leadership of the Community. These painters and sculptors refused to be assimilated into the building trades, such as carriage varnishers or wood gilders, whose work was reduced to a commonplace commodity assessable by measurement, just as one would sell a piece of meat by weight.



The Legacy of a Lexical Segregation



The legal emancipation of the artist occurred in the 1770s, carried by Turgot’s attempted labour reforms. Official texts from 1777 definitively separated decorative painting from the fine arts.


Painting and sculpture, in all their forms, acquired the status of free arts, detached from all commercial regulatory constraints and the oversight of craft masteries.


This ideal of the artist, driven by genius, nobility, and financial disinterestedness, was maintained after the Revolution with the creation of the Academy of Fine Arts under the Restoration in 1815, and in the academic discourse that cannot be understood without knowing this institutional history.


Throughout the 19th century, art criticism would continue to draw from the old depreciative vocabulary of venal and manual craftsmanship—formerly used to disqualify guild workers—to reject the supposed failures of modern painters to meet the classical norm.




This blog relies on the primary source anthology sheets provided by Art d’Histoire Académie:


Plus all those inserted as links in the blog above


You can also view our traditional, free-access videos:

The Art d’Histoire Académie platform specialises in primary sources and digitised archives covering the artistic period from 1850 to 1910.


It offers clear, structured interactive videos accompanied by a library of over a thousand anthology sheets, comprising 10,000 explained and contextualised primary sources that can be viewed in their original format.


Whether you are preparing for an exam, a lecture, a guided tour, a conference, an exhibition, or a publication, Art d’Histoire Académie is here to support you. The labyrinth of archives simply becomes what it ought to be for any passionate researcher: a source of inspiration and a space for fulfilment.


 
 
bottom of page